Sunday, January 15, 2017

“Anne Will” of criminal immigrants: The feeling of the people – MIRROR ONLINE

Recently, it is hardly an “Anne Will”broadcast, which was not prepared in the content and mood of a “crime scene”. In the social Thriller, it went to criminals, immigrants and dubious citizens fight back, so to internal security. “Citizens are confused – How to deal with criminal immigrants?”, will Anne Wants to know in the port and limits: “There is the scene of the crime, who has his own reality. But we will see how it looks like in the true reality”.

The following one-player from the really real reality (with certificate of authenticity!) the problem district of Berlin, Düsseldorf or Mannheim fizzles, the right-wing populist undertone in the Motto of the shipment very quickly. Because of the unsettled citizens of an urban focal points are self-Maghrebi, Turks, and Arabs.

Düzen Tekkal, a journalist and a CDU member, observes: “It is a Turkish petty bourgeoisie, which has complained”. The reason for the complaint: “The rule of law, the application of the law does not draw”, and the weakness of the society. And Yes, the “newly migrated” have changed the Situation felt “Bad”.

An unfortunate normal state

conducts research In the Following, the presenter Wants, whether massive Police should be part of the normal state. Olaf Scholz (SPD), first mayor of Hamburg, evades a direct answer and praises then so extensively by the police, that his answer only as a “Well, well, well,” to be understood.

CSU Urviech Edmund Stoiber, the nature, “not in order”. Because he can “look so far back,” he recalls in the introduction of video surveillance in Munich under his Aegis as the Bavarian Minister of the interior. He would also use the Bundeswehr Inside, as well as in France or Belgium, the army, the police support. He understands the “Reservation” against state violence as a “historically justified”, but emphasises: “we Now have a different Situation,” and, therefore, the unfortunate normal state.

Stoiber beats in the same score as Tekkal and wants to know: “Why are they all in Germany?” Illegal immigration had given us an “additional crime”. Larger public events? The go, only with a lot of police and “without women”. It follows the usual note of the Bayern Bavaria Bayern, in the best sense: “No-Go Areas, there is not in the second-largest Federal state of Germany!”, what is Olaf Scholz counters with a dry “No-Go-Areas in the second largest city in Germany also.”

A debate between the From – and upgrade

In Bavaria, the Saar countries Simone Peter (Green) may take not a role model: “I agree with the Thesis of Mr Stoiber that the rule of law eroded,” Stoiber heatedly: “that is The feeling of the people!” Reasons for this feeling, Peter the broken save of the police and of the fact, “that the officers of the CDU”, the handsome slip of the tongue, “would the officials of the police”, of course, always less.

More cameras in public space, Peter rejects because of political reasons, but because too many screens, then the official before of the cameras would be missing. “Blanket Surveillance” in General,, Peter, put nothing in the prevention of: “Non-stop, if you want to later on look”, who have done something wrong. Scholz from the page: “But that’s the occasion!”

To a normal state also belong to Scholz, that the authorities “would have had no problem on changing”. So hard to bear the thought, did not mean he, however, is that you can prevent the bombing of Berlin would be too. Also, Scholz can not exclude the possibility “that a case happens to Amri.” He welcomes, however, the by Thomas de Maizière and Heiko Maas presented tightening. He himself is harboring in Hamburg, 5,000 and required to leave the country, of which 1,500 without papers.

a social worker, Samy Charchira, on a daily basis with the corresponding problem cases, calls for “disarmament” in the debate and acknowledges that a consistent application of the laws and an accelerated deportation could change the situation. Also Tekkal wants to better distinguish between “Fake Refugees” and genuine refugees, so the authorities “upgrading” with people who might, for example, to determine the origin of delinquents.

In the final it comes to the classification of North African countries as safe countries of origin, here the political party lines are still very clear. Simone, Peter insists that such a classification was “not a helpful measure”, there would in Morocco or Algeria to face persecution.

Peter can escape the cause of sexual orientation is not mentioned Düzen Tekkal makes you still question: “also, Gays are beaten up in Berlin!” And: “to be a refugee, this is not a profession!”, what is Edmund Stoiber nods and explains: “We represent the people who might see things a little rough”, and this is said very nicely.

superfluous

Olaf Scholz, in turn, breaks the social democratic middle ground. He criticized, in the debate on safe countries of origin would say, “a lot of Ideological”. Pragmatically, the asylum was to defend the right only if the citizens would be guaranteed that there is no illegal way past it.

“Want to sigh In this excited mood,” how to lead a sober debate, ask the right questions? Your guests will oppose her because closed, all questions should be asked, is also critical. Peter gets the opportunity to regret your criticism of the word choice of the Cologne police (“Nafris”) again as a rashly – with the Shitstorm, she was exposed to, therefore, the impression of a heated atmosphere.

Olaf Scholz feels not at all addressed: “I’m very cool”, what Anne Wants to certify the proud elbphilhar moniker to be understanding: “you have heard a lot of classical music in the past few days.”

at the end of the “current” message comes that “73 percent of Germans” felt in Germany, to be sure – the show was so unnecessary. Unless the Tandem from “the scene” and “Anne Will” had done it’s job.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment