High Politically goes it to the new Stuttgart “Tatort”. “The Indian” deals with Stuttgart 21 and a murder case within the mega-construction project. The commissioners Lannert and Bootz determine in a web of corruption, bribery and intrigue. Not only that makes it complicated
What’s it really To corruption, bribery, fraud, very, very much money.? – And a mega-construction project. “The Indian” is an economic crime to “Stuttgart 21″ – the theme so that has kept the city like no other in recent years in breathing. Around the real events and the violent clashes between opponents and supporters of lowering the Stuttgart train station, the story of a murder is told, have to clarify the Commissioners Thorsten Lannert (Richy Müller) and Sebastian Bootz (Felix Klare) here.
The former secretary of state, Jürgen Dillinger (Robert Schupp), is shot dead while jogging. Shortly before he had to testify in the investigation committee of the state parliament. It was about “Bombaygate”, a building scandal in the vicinity of Stuttgart 21. On a vacant Stuttgart-21 construction area should be a huge residential project created – built by the star architect Busso von Mayer (Thomas Thieme) with the money of the alleged deep-pocketed Indian Investors Mantal. The whole was financially backed by a state guarantee in the tens of millions, was directly involved in the State Dillinger. However, the Indian investor turned out to be impostors, the building project failed and Busso von Mayer walked behind bars. Dillinger, however, had always any responsibility from himself
This is the action-Kracher:. is the assassination of the ex-Secretary of State committed by a professional killer in a wooded area , This results in an exchange of fire. Dillinger was up and running with the former Prime Minister Heinerle (Ulrich Gebauer) agreed, who had been voted out as part of the Stuttgart-21 clashes. Whose bodyguards denied by the killer when fleeing. Action fans need to give then also pleased with this scene
How many blood spatter Gibt’s:. Thrice flows in this “scene” from writer-director Niki Stein blood. Stuck mainly a scene that can be seen at the beginning and the end: A suitcase with a dead body, which was found at the construction site at the Stuttgart train station is opened in the coroner’s office. The Commissioners hold because of the strong odor of decay disgust hands to his nose, fly whirring can be heard – very unappetizing.
The ??? – moment: There are some. This “scene” requires the viewer nonstop from full concentration. This is partly due to the very complex, sensitive issue with many entanglements. But the sophisticated staging with various time jumps and restless camera work in committee of inquiry does not make it easier. Just says Dillinger, then announces a newscast that he was shot, then give the investigators held a press conference to the crime, later the murder scene can be seen. Since it is difficult to always follow.
The bizarre appearance: Goethe, Ibsen and Dr. Vogt – coroner Dr. Vogt (Jürgen Hartmann) has developed a penchant for belles lettres, quotes Goethe and relies on Ibsen. When he opens the suitcase with the unknown for the audience at that time body, he says: “I would say that is the price of his position as an artist.” Then follows Ibsen quote is displayed as text:
“And every day he has to see how this new price will be required. Again and again – always, always “
What it’s all about, is in the” not explicitly declared Tatort “. The quotation is from Henrik Ibsen’s play “The Master Builder”, which focuses on a ruthless, aspiring to success contractor is. One finds some parallels between this “crime scene” and the Ibsen drama, the end of the 19th century originated
hardness of Commissioners:. Lannert and Bootz act as always calmly and cool , Once almost too cool: Go as an anti-Stuttgart 21 activists on the street, the situation escalated and a police car was set on fire. The randomly coming to bring the perpetrators Lannert unceremoniously to case by – whoosh – issuing the leg. The works here unintentionally funny.
Who is the episode Darling? Although star architect Busso von Mayer is not a special popular figure, but certainly the most interesting character in this film. The Ombudsman can not get over that his visionary building project failed, this would have been “for eternity”, as he says. Mayer, who is serving his sentence in an open prison, has a penchant for megalomania, draws parallels between his designs and buildings such as St. Mark’s Square in Venice. The protests against Stuttgart 21, he can not understand, it was “the best thing that can happen to the city.” Stuttgart was “a sinkhole, an urban planning error, a zubetonierter valley,” he scolds in a monologue – impressively presented by Thomas Thieme. The surveys Mayers by Commissioner Lannert behind bars are staged intimate play-like
The funniest scene. … goes to the account of the fallen star architect. He grumbles: Instead of the appearance of the city to make a change, the opponents of Stuttgart 21 suggested on, “when a supposedly rare beetle species is decimated by Baumfällung”. Mayer adds, “Hello ?! What do the bark beetle ?! The eat trees “
The Depp by service: Not good coming in this economic crime over the press. At press conferences will rumgemosert and especially a lady with the strange name Fee Waldner – the unappealing-tough editor of celebrity portal – occurs quite rude, which acts oversubscribed and placed. Fee then also looks pretty stupid from the laundry when Lannert confiscated her laptop, rather than providing them with information hoped. The built-in newscasts act partly misplaced
The most romantic moment. The accomplice of the offender acts out of love …
The FOCUS Online Conclusion: “The Indian” is an extremely ambitious economic crime. To Stuttgart to spin 21 a murder case, is an exciting idea. But not only the story, but also the staging is so demanding that it acts “Tatort” with its chronological jumps diffuse and it is exhausting to keep at it.
No comments:
Post a Comment