power plant appears again in the future of popular music shape – so to speak. A sound sequence Düsseldorf pioneers of techno-pop is an occasion for the Federal Constitutional Court to overturn the law for sampling. There are three bars of the song “Metal on Metal” from the album “Trans Europe Express” from 1977. These two seconds have the nucleus of each category of electronic music: techno and hip hop would be inconceivable without this composition
the rapper and producer Moses Pelham has the piece in 1997 repeatedly assembled together in his studio and it tinkered an infinite loop that he “only me” his artist Sabrina Setlur used as chassis for the song. Kraftwerk-founding member Ralf Hütter goes since 2004 before a court against it. He came from a generation that had made even her music, he said. With its total energy he created the piece as a young man. Pelham should have to ask for permission. He quoted the seventh commandment: “Thou shalt not steal.” The 25 year younger Pelham argued with the artistic freedom: Art set deals with the art of others, and hip-hop is based on the principle of quote. The Bundesgerichtshof gave Ralf Hütter 2008 Legal: Sampling is allowed, but it must create a self-contained work, which significantly differs from the original sequence. If you can import the melodies themselves, the artist must do and must not use the original. The dispute ended in the Constitutional Court. The judgment was delivered yesterday: The case must be re-decided, the Supreme Court should review again
In fact, the most important stylistic devices of contemporary music in court, sampling, using foreign sound recordings in his own music is so.. So far, it went where similar clashes mainly to tunes. The protected. Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke have experienced this when they were sentenced to more than seven million in 2015 dollar fine because they had sold out for the hit “Blurred Lines” on Marvin Gaye’s “Got To Give It Up”. In rhythm sequences and bass runs the legal
is less clear, although Pop today is based primarily on.
Pelham’s reasoning is understandable in part because HipHop was born from the sampling , Kraftwerk are among the meistgesampelten artists in the world. Last Coldplay expanded its single “Talk” of elements of power plant called “Computer Love” together. Hütter has mentioned that the group asked for permission in a letter formulated in German and handwritten. Such agreements are a good deal for the owners. It is estimated that only 23 percent of the revenue for Kraftwerk rights in the past 15 years accounted for the four most popular samples of the group.
The Federal Constitutional Court is now arguing that the sample that Pelham has used as short was that a new, independent work of art is created without power plant it created an economic loss. A ban would “exclude the creation of music of a certain style in practice”. The court’s decision could pave the way for a reasonable deal with the peculiarities of art form popular music. Sampling has been simplified by digitizing on. The verdict of the Supreme Court judgment did not fit quite a reality. But one can also understand Hütter: The Author has come into its own. Whether there will be a pay duty for musicians be sampled if the creator of the document must be mentioned in the CD booklet, now decides the BGH. In addition, the case will be submitted to the European Court, because the copyright is harmonized across the EU since 2002.
. <- / 1017380 / RPO_unter_Artikel_540x300 ->
No comments:
Post a Comment