Man, Jauch. One of the most popular TV presenters of the Republic, if not the most popular makes, after four years at his own request an end to his Sunday talk show on First. He has no pleasure in prestigious broadcasting slot of the German political talk. On Sunday he will be there to see for the last time. Loaded is only one guest:. Politician Wolfgang Schäuble
There are three strategies that can be an obituary, in this case to submit the balance sheet of a television program, , Once, of course, the most popular, because most attention methodology: the merciless billing, Jauch has failed. Then the great counter-stroke to-Brush: Jauch has done nothing wrong, his critics are calculated mud spin. And the speculatively-critical method: Jauch has not convinced, but he was not as bad as it was made after the announcement of his retirement. As the critics were in the arms and his successor Anne Will celebrated. The had already been Jauch predecessor and had to evacuate their place at the time for the new purchase expensive, although they had done their job well.
Let’s start with the easiest exercise, the billing. Jauch has often unmoderated sovereign. In mid-October spread of AFD man Björn Höcke not only a Germany flag on his Talk armchair, but also his world view, the “1000 Years of Germany” evokes, with unmistakable connotations to the Third Reich. Moderate means finding the right balance, and have a balancing effect.
But in this case failed Jauch, the agitator to ask questions that would have brought the patriotic facade lurks behind the ethnic nationalism to crumble. The question “What do you mean?” was too little. The decision to leave “all sides have their say” come as Jauch editorial commented, need a moderator who relies not only on the principle of self-exposure. Whoever does not believe should specifically look at this program a second time in order to detect painful as helpless and toothless, he worked there.
A lot of criticism for the success spoiled Moderator
The evening on which the famous Varoufakis-Stinkefinger was the focus , was also an affront to the enlightened audience. One may think of the egotistical Greeks what you like. But to switch on the then Finance Minister in Athens to the mission and then to confront him with the video of a speech in which he allegedly held his middle finger in the direction of Germany, which was cheaper populism. The speech was more than two years old, ripped the detail shown from the context.
2012 already criticized the ARD program advisory board in an internal opinion that the “mirror” publicly made, Jauch with harsh words. His conversation was “significantly” to criticize. He sat down on his answers guests away, but follow its pre-concept and tick off questions. He operate even “cheap propaganda”, take answers in advance. This review is likely to be not abgeperlt also to the success spoiled moderator.
Where should not be misappropriated, that also Jauch predecessor Anne Will shortly after its launch in 2008 by this same Advisory board had been taken violently through the wringer. You do not have ready facts fast enough, they said, could not follow discussion gradients. And Sabine Christiansen, who founded the ARD political talk on Sunday ruled the “Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung” once the presenter to draw primarily by their “lack of interest in knowledge” from. Note: On Sunday Talker critics particularly fond of working from
As if it were the other way around.? So now the rehabilitation after the bashing: Jauch is the man without agenda. The possible presuppositions asks who wants not prejudiced, but honestly know why. Jauch knows how people interested in politics, the off or else had not even turned on. And that’s why he risked it, sometimes invite an AFD hardliners or the former Pegida-Kathrin Oertel. At the risk that it just goes wrong.
The Jauch strategy
“I am a fearless person,” Jauch had protested before the start. He embodies in his talk-shape man who knows not know exactly what to think, but would like to learn more. The formed, which has its beliefs. But that does not occur as a wiseacre. The one looks sometimes when he can not keep up, because a host can not stop with urge to communicate. But Jauch is more than the man with the lowbrow expression, the Talk-mate frank plasberg recently “Dackelblick” called.
According to the program of the leukemia Guido Westerwelle in early October, there was praise. That was quite good, it was almost patronizing. Let’s talk about their fates people without dripping pathos that he can. That evening succeeded in Jauch, to give but one direction Westerwelle emotions space and the conversation.
The odds of “Günther Jauch” were quite good. Okay, before most of the crowd puller “Tatort” ran, which he profited. But that alone does not explain why an average of nearly five million viewers watched his mission, even though they supposedly worthless.
The most honest criticism is a both-and. What can Jauch, is to give a little confused-looking buyers. Cultivated in more than 20 years, “Stern TV” on RTL. This strategy can sometimes be quite clever. A seemingly innocent question can interlocutor open, sometimes more herauskitzeln as tough confrontation. But with this approach politicians caught very seldom. Bringing Jauch schwertut, is to assume the role of uncomfortable, stringent questioner that an attitude not only has, but this also clearly signaled.
Exasperated by “third-class worriers” in the ARD
This may sound cheap. An attitude – what does it matter? Partisanship? No. Attitude is to have a clear idea of how a call is in progress confidently, without knowing the result already. Talk shows, not only led by Jauch, give often after no more than half of the airtime the way things go. On television, is being fought today rarely unconditionally for a good conversation. After a while, Moderator seem to think as viewers: Well, then says stop your sayings on, perhaps there still anything it out
Günther Jauch has its entertainment programs on RTL, led by “Millionaire?”, never gave up. He will moderate in the coming year. He does it because he enjoys it and because he may or ARD has allowed him. Yet was this back and forth between the parallel worlds of a successful talk show in the way. For the job on Sunday evening it takes a journalist who can fully concentrate on politics. The not-between with Thomas Gottschalk and Oliver Pocher hampelt by a game show. At this peak time slot has a moderator who breathes the consignment. The ARD praised bye, Jauch Talk have “fit” for Sunday night. What does this mean? Would it not have been much better to make a talc which makes you forget what day it is?
Jauch and the ARD, also includes about This story came basically never really together. First, the man actually ZDF had made the TV star, the ARD had given a basket, after long negotiations. That was 2007, and Jauch was unnerved by “bodies full Gremlins” and “third-class worriers” in public service system.
Jauch television personality is larger than the talk show
Four years later succeeded the intendant of the ARD but then to bait Jauch. With money and good words. Jauch company I & U TV received in lush 10.5 million euros to produce the Talk. And it will have no lack of assurances that he would have great freedom of design. This summer, then an admission that it can be run not so good behind the scenes.
Meanwhile Jauch 59 years old. The official line is that he could hear from both professional and personal reasons to. Unofficial translation: The ARD has not sufficiently supported him, and he does not need to be constant criticism endure. He finally the entertainment programs, which he apparently fit better – and better suit him.
No, Günther Jauch is measured with fair standards, not completely failed. “Günther Jauch”, live from the Gasometer in Berlin, is TV history to which we will remember not long. But Jauch as a television personality is larger than the talk show that bore his name. Jauch man.
No comments:
Post a Comment