Like so much turmoil and angry criticism could to and arise at the Causa Gina-Lisa Lohfink, is the latest clear when the judge announced the verdict 80 daily rates of 250 Euro for a total of 20,000 euros, Lohfink have to pay for false accusation. She has to this conviction, the Amtsgericht Berlin-Tiergarten has arrived, two men wrongly accused of having raped her in the night of 2 to 3 June 2012 Design. Hardly has Antje Ebner announced the verdict, screaming supporters Lohfinks collectively “buh!” and left the room. Also Lohfink even jumps up angrily and rushes outside.
The reasoning of the Court they do not want to hear. Here this is very revealing. Finally, even Lohfinks defense asserted itself, there had never been an official rape allegation. More on that later.
A dozen supporters from #TeamGinaLisa has come on this day for Amtsgericht Berlin. You have speakers built, through which they “No God, no state, no patriarchy!” chant. And they hung a banner: “hatred as never before on the German justice”
figurehead of “No means No!” – Motion
There is probably no longer get through to them that they do, the wrong face were looking for their cause with Gina-Lisa Lohfink, actress, model and alleged rape victim. It has been stylized by their counsel to “precedent” for the reform of the Penal Code, the figurehead of “No means No!” – Movement. Not even the judgment will probably change anything. Because the interpretation of history was written before it ended at all. Approximately as the Federal Minister of Justice rather unusual way indirectly commented before the verdict that “protection gaps” in criminal law give – in order to promote his reform. Or as the family minister said, “No means No need apply”, and also voters effectively joined the #TeamGinaLisa.
The 29-year-old defendant is in light gray pantsuit and pumps the last act appeared in this high-profile drama. While the prosecutor considers their plea, Lohfink looks bored at her shoes with snakeskin pattern. “It is absurd that it is claimed that this sacrifice is made to the perpetrator,” says Corinna Gögge and fights thus against the criticism of the process, against voices of Gina-Lisa-supporters, who claimed that the judiciary was biased because someone with no good sex fairs experience and silicone breasts victim. Lohfinks allegations are simply wrong, “a mockery and deception of all women and men who are in fact a victim of rape,” said the prosecutor.
On what exactly applies to the “No “?
Lohfink holding with almost tearfully against: what” these boys “have done to her, she says,” I’m going to the end of my bear in me “. It is also the first and also the last time that it manifests itself in court. Lohfink is often in Sat.1 “breakfast television” appeared as before the bench, has spoken in front of cameras and microphones as in these last few minutes of evidence. It says Gögge, there would have been some urgent questions to them. . Among the many contradictions that had opened in their version of the story
In the heart of the matter: In the night of 2 to 3 June 2012 Lohfink has sex with two men who filmed the. In a 28-second sequence can be seen as Lohfink “No” and says “Stop”. This sequence was publicly discussed much. The prosecution relates the “No” on films, not to sexual intercourse itself. Contrast Lohfink brings knockout drops into play, says the sex was done against their will. The men get fines for the dissemination of the video. Lohfink should also fined 24,000 euros, for false accusation. Because they do not accept the punishment, she comes to court as defendant, not as victims. Now she was sentenced.
“The women are like rubber dolls thrown by beds”
There are numerous inconsistencies which were worked out in the process. The most important: Lohfinks former attorney presented initially as an indication for the dissemination of the video; the men had tried to sell it to the press. In this first display of 8 June 2012, is of “consensual sex” talk, until a week later that is withdrawn, now it is called “rape”.
you’ve had a blackout, says Lohfink. Only when she saw the videos, the memory of the night had returned fragmentary. Nevertheless, she wrote one of the men continued WhatsApp messages that they miss him. And that memory after administration of knockout drops come back, is medically impossible, says a toxicological expert who all video sequences has looked at from that night and comes to the conclusion that Lohfink awake, perfectly oriented, responsive and active was.
These scenes, as she poses for the video, smoking, dancing and singing, looks directly at the camera. In parting, she purses her lips. Your manager has testified she phoned Lohfink while they had still been in the apartment of one of the two men. You just ordered pizza, have Lohfink since told her at ease. He had very often examined women knockout drops would get administered by some incidents it also give video. “The women are like rubber dolls thrown by beds,” says Torsten appraiser Bins check Domaß. “They can not smoke or call her manager or tell you that they want to eat pizza.”
“This is a legal ruse”
Lohfink had claimed that it was after the night at a doctor who had been “shocked” because of their wounds. A supposedly existing certificate but she was unable to produce to date. Now his lawyer submits the “aide-mémoire” a gynecologist from 14.6.2012. Lohfink had claimed to have been raped, it says, but it had no injuries. “Unobtrusive gynecological status” the gynecologist has listed
Whatever the tactics of Lohfinks defender is highly irritating, you might say. Twofold. While Lohfink, presented in the numerous interviews she has given outside the courtroom as victims of rape or allowed to introduce, as with statements such as: “.? I said no, repeatedly ‘No’ What’s not to understand” says criminal lawyer Burkhard Benecken in his plea: “. in my view that was not consensual sex Whether it’s a rape, is another matter, but the woman has Lohfink yes never said..” is in the second indication yes only “generally” been talked about rape and in their police interrogation to his client had expressed “total restraint”.
judge Antje Ebner summarizes this strategy in their explanation briefly: “this is a legal ruse.” Following this logic, namely there had never been an official accusation of rape – and so Lohfink could not be convicted of false accusation and
€ 150,000 Mortgage for Jungle Camp
<. p id = "p18" class = "text prefix_1 artContent"> This legal ruse apparently for Benecken no problem. “This is the case, which led to the amendment of the Penal Code,” he says. “Whether it is right or the wrong, does not matter.” In other words: Whether Gina-Lisa Lohfink was raped or not, does not matter, it has served a greater cause
So obviously everyone has their own agenda. , To Lohfink itself it was in this case anyway the least. The other day was to read that she had been engaged for the next edition of the “jungle camps”, for 150,000 euros Gage. But it never went to her public, Lohfink asserts in her closing remarks. “I am a very simple girl from the village, which has become famous overnight,” she concludes. And advises: “To all the girls out there who do not become famous, is studying or is training this Media … that’s not so easy all..” You even wonder imitate her Abi.
Immediately after the verdict takes Lohfink a taxi. It is the first time that they are no more interviews.
No comments:
Post a Comment