Wednesday, July 27, 2016

David Yates filmed the “Legend of Tarzan” – Trailer Review – THE WORLD

Once, there was the man who looks as if he had used up the annual protein supplies a gym chain lately, a gorilla in the arm. Or rather: He has his head in his arms, because such an animal – even if we are here in the film and it comes from the computer, so of zeros and ones composed – yes is quite huge.

The Gorilla is a bitch. It dies. “Huhu” makes the man. The Gorilla woman nods. She was his mother. Your eye breaks.

So came the disaster on the freedom of the jungle. And it is man-made, such as all the animals, ostriches and wildebeests, elephants and hippos, which we in David Yates’ Legend of Tarzan “thanks to the pretty wily 3-D technology but rather come close to the cinema .



The Schundroman brother Mogli

Every legend that keeps reasonably worth its salt wants, so for each new generation are retold. That is their right. So also of Tarzan, the saga of Gorilla youth and later ruler of the jungle, this African Schundroman brother of Rudyard Kipling’s wolf cub Mowgli.

The generation, however, for the tries retread David Yates to 1912 had come and felt the station bookstores world three dozen times filmed myth of the ape-man, seems to be a rather strange hybrid creatures. Look Addict and enlightened and politically correct and emancipated and critical of capitalism, anti-racist and kitsch possessed.

Photo: Warner Bros the monkey has no name, the White is in normal life Alexander Skarsgård and was star of the HBO series “True Blood”

There go more cracks through it, when the poor Tarzan, Lord of the really John Clayton of Greystoke is yes, bears scars on the body and of course to the soul. So a simple story of freedom in the jungle, from the possibility of a paradise in the jungle and the expulsion from him would perhaps believe no man. Perhaps rightly so.

And so is because paradise just a pretty sad Trope, as Yates (with his team the last four “Harry Potter” to answer for movies has) begins with its history. A real story is not out of it. And has this been so going on that Yates his legend historically accurately anchored, which is rather unusual and legends – as can be seen here again -. Is quite visionary disabling

The suit biases, the Looking sad

it is the year 1889. Lord Greystoke lives with his wife Jane, a jungle large but quite dark estate in Britain. The jungle attracts only occasionally through his dreams. So to feel right at home, he does not appear in the suit. He also stressed fairly.

In the Congo, the Tarzan paradise was once the gorillas and lions and wildebeest, meanwhile, is going to hell. King Leopold II. Of Belgium brings regardless of human losses from its distant colony, which can always make gold. Diamonds and slaves.

Photo: Jonathan Olley Warner Bros. Pictures the chief of the barbarians looks wild. Unfortunately, he did not quite understand what’s really happening. This then tells him Lord Greystoke

On a Congolese tribe exemplary ritualized Indians he fails, however, respectively Leon Rome, his diabolical mastermind, a kind heart of darkness on two legs.

The chief (leopard skin, very dark black, wild eyes, big cats head back on – like a picture book of the colonialists) demanded as the price for his cooperation after Tarzan. The head is not enough for him. He wants revenge.



In the jungle for a good cause

The crude King invites Greystoke so which could lead to the innocence of Belgian extraction of raw materials, an image. Tarzan’s Prime Minister makes hopes of fine shops. An American envoy that it actually existed, despite its absurd name George Washington Williams wants educate about Leopold’s cruel regime in Congo, he needs the legend Tarzan as a label.

Tarzan sets off for a good cause. That he is a multiple puppet, he does not notice, interested him – at least apparently – not (puppets hang anyway even on strings that look like lianas). Jane wants to. The misfortune of the film takes its course.

Photo: Jonathan Olley We are here not at Rosamunde Pilcher. Not quite anyway. Alexander Skarsgård and Margot Robbie at home in the English garden

There are now before the all too very degenerates here in Mäkelei, quite fine moments. The animals, for example, look pretty great. One must soon – that is animal rights activists are pleased – actually go in any zoo more to come as close as wild animals.

Just the lion, which snuggles herzallerliebst Tarzan, smell indeed very funny. This olfactory disaster can save himself and his nose in the cinema. The animals in the “Jungle Book” saw indeed a little better, to have the jungle Yates’ computer but calculated with the same perfection.



Christoph Waltz is really quite angry

Christoph Waltz, who are the murderous Leon Rome, although needs to a time typical Moustache allude, but that’s very great. He invested in these sadistic mischievous person all the energy that he could not get rid of in “Spectre”.

fine, for example, how he – just he has Jane, giving it the writer has played with vigorous dramatic groan in his hands, at dinner dangerous with his ground Rosary nearly killed and can bring in their cell – even fine knife and fork on her plate so arranged that the steward may realize that their food is finished. If anything devilish, then cultured.



Lady Jane could have died early

Honestly would have a Death of Lady Jane, the yes also has a wild jungle moving story that David Yates told in quite woodcut-style flashbacks, not regretted. Margot Robbie endeavors with power to give the emancipated ladyship and to be beautiful and a defender of the colored people. Unfortunately, her mimic talent extends not much further than that of – say – Yvonne Elliman.

Sometimes you wish for when they must hold out for dramatic effect to the end already, that Lady Jane might have from the computer should be zusammenrechnen. You would possibly become more credible.

Photo: Jonathan Olley / Warner Bros. Margot Robbie endeavors. One can not say otherwise. But it goes one on pretty fast, pretty much on the nerve

where the monkeys demonstrate, however, that not all the computer to is save. They do what they have always done their real counterparts in Tarzan films. You have moments of surprising humanity and flog otherwise like such on their chests one that you would start to worry, you did not know that they are not genuine, the monkeys.

Alexander Skarsgård finally remains – when he was not swinging freely and with a liana in the hands of all the laws of physics breaks down – a melancholy stranger in his own story. One thinks it constantly to see that he does not believe that you had to tell again the legend of the monkey man.

What especially because of the fact that you can not stop gets solved entirely from the old narrative and thus by colonialism of the old Burroughs. The hero is a Lord. One can James Bond Idris Elba occupy, Tarzan not.



The black celebrate the whites on the hills

And so the animals run at the end of everything to Klump. The computers are no longer according to the calculation, which is why the final Wildtierstampede optically rather second-rate fails.

As Mowgli, the little man, who saved at the end of the new cinema “Jungle Book” free nature of the Indian jungle before the Prime Evils creature Shirkan because she was not able to do, the white man muskulierte saves at the end of “Tarzan” Africa from evil.

The blacks may stand on the hill and celebrate. They have spears in their hands. You want to be main to the nearest shoulder sit and quietly say “Huhu”.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment