What do you want us to tell the scriptwriters
Christian repentance?: Let us be write a thriller, in which all characters change roles, yet faced with the bitter truth in the end. In this case, a child and a Great Lie possibly murdered Manager the concept works perfectly. Great dialogue and look cinema with particularly grim investigators.
Lars-Christian Daniels: Faber (Jörg Hartmann) memories of his deceased family. His doubts about one’s own abilities. Kossiks burgeoning alcoholism. Bönischs (Anna Schudt) longing for her son. A rapprochement between Faber and Bönisch. A rapprochement between the High Commissioners and Kossik Dalay. A disciplinary procedure, a psychologist, two punches: This is what we tell them by the way. Because it is so immensely entertaining.
Kurt Sagatz: If we have to worry that our children something has happened, quickly lose many social conventions of their importance – not only to super hot “dog days” in Dortmund. Who can then say how he would behave if he loses his child? The new scene from Dortmund is therefore also more drama as crime – and therefore once again well worth seeing.
Kirstin Lopau: “There are dog days in Dortmund The city glows..” Prior to this sultry backdrop backed by equally hot reggae chords roll the scriptwriters a case of 14 years ago on, Bönischs first case, and here we are already at the meaning of it all: We all and particularly our Dortmunder friends not escape the past, no matter how much we try to repress it.
How convincing Commissioners
? <- tile: 8 desktop adctrl ->
Christian Buss: 9 points.
Lars-Christian Daniels: Faber: 10 points, Bönisch: 10 points, Dalay: 7 points, Kossik: 6 points.
Kurt Sagatz: The four of Dortmund convince even in exceptional situations: 8 points.
Kirstin Lopau: Faber, still broken than usual and therefore at least initially obnoxious, yet played as always brilliant: 9 points; Boenisch is his time in every way, is much more compatible (and can burp the national anthem): 9 points; Kossik becoming the Ekelpaket, slowly, but it is: 8 points; Dalay only occurs this time a little into the background: 7 points.
Our critics
Christian repentance is culture editor at Spiegel Online and writes there regularly on the scene .
Lars-Christian Daniels discusses on his blog What was the scene? and the online magazine Screenrush the scene and other TV – and movies.
Kurt Sagatz’s media editor at Tagesspiegel and writes there regularly on the scene .
Kirstin Lopau is Time Magazine -Leserin and one of the most opinionated commentators at our Sunday scene -Diskussionen on Facebook.
What is your favorite scene
Christian Buss: The wife on the autopsy table on which lies the body of her murdered husband: “What am I to do Is there any provision to which I can hold me What do you do when one’s husband is there???” A moment unexcited cruelty. Much more efficient than the standard breakdowns in other thrillers.
Lars-Christian Daniels: “Better not.” – When Peter Faber and Martina Bönisch closer after the third doses Pils in Faber’s Saab, pulling the eccentric chief superintendent at the last minute the tear line. Shortly thereafter to make it with the same car seat a chip shop operation. And again to pull the tear line. You have it easy like.
Kurt Sagatz: Christian Jeltsch, the author of the screenplay, has done with the dialogues hard work: The saying “Compassion is the precursor to Gnadenschuss “from Chief Superintendent Peter Faber brings the madness in the Dortmund team of investigators with a single sentence to the point.
Kirstin Lopau: Pronounced favorite scenes I had two: Faber appearance at the psychotherapist (“all you guys have one on the waffle!”) and the beautiful duel resulting therefrom. Wonders who has found his master. However, a dialogue between Bönisch and Faber is especially: Faber thinks he has saved the night the killer and not the victim from drowning, and doubts übelstlaunig itself and the world. Bönisch: “It was night, Faber, you are not clairvoyant.” Faber: “. Yes, thank you, I need no sympathy This is the precursor to the coup de grace.” Bönisch: “This is not a pity, that’s logical, but if you want to ‘nen Gnadenschuss – Peng.” (holds his two fingers to his temple and expresses symbolically from). I confess: Dortmund are increasingly becoming my favorite team (sorry, Commissioner Stedefreund!), Because they are simply not a team and still getting their act together somehow. This time it comes Faber and Bönisch against Dalay and Kossik, with amorous rejections in two two constellations, so that Jane Austen would have real joy.
What is the most embarrassing moment?
Christian Buss: that is alluded repeatedly to the abortion of Commissioner Dalay in the case to the controversial child eventually becomes but a bit pushy. Terminated pregnancy sadness understood to potential offspring, Embassy arrived!
Lars-Christian Daniels: There is a really embarrassing moment not – but Kossiks boozy pubs courses after work had the filmmakers in the face of numerous sideshow also good for the next scene Dortmund can save.
Kurt Sagatz: Peter Faber and his colleague Martina Bönisch use role play, when they no longer get stuck in solving a case. This seems for the two to work, but must therefore also young colleague Nora Dalay and Daniel Kossik do with it?
Kirstin Lopau: Maren Eggert, the Fast-wife of Commissioner Borowski emerges here as a desperate mother whose child disappeared 14 years ago – and I always see only the fiancée of Borowski before me. For me, not well staffed. Oh, and the seating situation the therapist: one has the now so?
Your Appreciation for the result?
Christian Buss: 9 points.
Lars-Christian Daniels: 7 points.
Kurt Sagatz: A case with depth and not predictable output: 8 points.
Kirstin Lopau: 8 points.
No comments:
Post a Comment