Why you must not be afraid to stumble before going to the movies on a detail from “The awakening of the power.”
One thing first: If you have read this text, need yourself “Star Wars: The Awakening of power” no longer qualifies. Do not believe me? Well so
But:. If in this text certain details of the plot – so-called spoiler – stand would (which is not the case, this much can be said for calming), then there would be readers who exactly on Facebook would or write in an email to us: “! Oh great, now you have all betrayed Then I need the film no longer even to look at”
What would be a poor medium for a film if would agree? If a film would not have more to offer than a few plot details – who with whom, who, who is against whom who? Would we really go to the movies? Or we would not prefer to read the summary at Wikipedia?
Spoiler-anxiety leads to bizarre overreactions
The very notion is nonsense. “Spoiler” comes from the English “to spoil”, that is corrupt. So a spoiler spoils something: a film, a serial, a novel, a football game. The fear of a few thoughtless words is enormous just the Internet. No special format commands that make specific passages of text visible when the reader: As soon as an online forum – – from the tiny niche community with five members up to the global mega-forum Reddit therefore comes without “spoiler tags” from Extra
clicks This leads to bizarre overreactions. “Especially cool I found indeed the scene,” wrote one user even in a film forum on “Die Hard 4″, “as [spoiler] Bruce Willis the black-haired terrorists shoots [/spoiler] “. Everything for fear of spoiling someone with this totally surprise free information the fun of movie? Or rather for fear of something irrational anger of those who have been very, very firmly undertaken to really want to know nothing about the new film, but have strayed inexplicably still in the discussion of a text to the movie?
are self on the Internet not all people badly
In this spoiler may well have a meaning. They serve in an interview – this includes the monologue of a movie review – to ensure a level playing field. The critic has already seen the film, and with this knowledge advantage he pleads with his audience. He has to a certain extent explain why he took the movie good or bad – and will try to argue by way of examples, so that the text does not become a meaningless expression
So he’ll have spoilers.. In moderation and wisely. Because for every spoiler, which he does, he wants to give to the reader something new. He exchanges the vile plot detail against an idea or knowledge, which further brings the reader and later film Cloudy. If you want to talk to someone about a football game, then you would the conversation indeed rather start with “madness, as the Lewandowski at 2: 0 has caught the ball” than with “Bayern 2: 0″. Kluge spoilers are a win for authors and for readers.
A Guada hoits of, and to attend Schlechtn iss ned schod
Unfortunately it needs for belonging confidence. Trust that the one who spoilert, just is not a malicious Depp, but has carefully considered why he betrays something. A trust that probably only very few Internet users have placed today. Or PR agencies told reporters, because the requests at press screenings about, but not “to spoil the fun of the film” the readers.
And if it should happen, if you but suddenly stumble into a spoiler ? Not so bad! Think about whether you really wanted to see the movie the only reason to see how he goes. . Or if you perhaps you prefer the action sequences, want to see the betrayal and the love scenes with his own eyes
A Bavarian proverb describes it quite well: “A Guada hoits of, and to attend Schlechtn iss ned schod.” A good film can endure it, and to have a bad it’s not too bad. No matter what I tell you: you would be “Star Wars: The Awakening of power” want to watch anyway. And you would do well. No spoilers in the world would make it a worse movie
No comments:
Post a Comment